<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bookmarking on The Bruised Edge</title><link>https://blog.kevinclarke.info/tags/bookmarking/</link><description>Recent content in Bookmarking on The Bruised Edge</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 22:42:23 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.kevinclarke.info/tags/bookmarking/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Perfect Social Network</title><link>https://blog.kevinclarke.info/article/the-perfect-social-network/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 22:42:23 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://blog.kevinclarke.info/article/the-perfect-social-network/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really miss del.icio.us. For me, it was the perfect social network. That&amp;rsquo;s really what I want from a social network: I want to be able bookmark things I find interesting, and read the links that other people (that I follow) find
interesting. I don&amp;rsquo;t need any more than that. I don&amp;rsquo;t even need to know why they found the link interesting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the many years, I&amp;rsquo;ve tried to use other social networks (with varying degrees of success/satisfaction). What&amp;rsquo;s really been consistent, though, is that I&amp;rsquo;ve tried to use them all as either a bookmarking service or a blog. When I
was on Google+ (which, I thought, was a pretty good one, as far as social networks go), someone once said (in response to something I&amp;rsquo;d said) that using a social network and not wanting to actually engage with others was
masturbatory. It made me laugh, but, okay. I see that perspective and I&amp;rsquo;m fine with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>